Pages

Sunday, June 11, 2006

Revising the Training Plan... Yet again

I'm sure I'm doing myself no good by revising the training plan yet again, but my goals seem to be changing every few weeks or so.

Ironman Coeur d'Alene is likely not a reality next year. I just don't know how I can find the time to help raise two newborns and still have the energy to go to work and train for an Ironman race. I still haven't ruled it out, but I only have a few weeks to decide, as the 2006 Ironman CdA race is rapidly approaching, and I would need to sign up as soon as registration for 2007 opens following the race.

Okay... so what's the current plan? Running. I'm a terrible runner. I used to be pretty good as a kid, but alas! I'm slow as an adult. This is the one area of multisport I REALLY need to work on. So how am I going to do it? The Colorado Outward Bound Relay and the Denver Marathon.

The Colorado Outward Bound Relay is a 24 hour, 170-mile, 10-person relay race through the Rocky Mountains on September 8-9. It consists of 30 separate race legs ranging from about 3-12 miles each. Each team member is required to run 3 legs of the race, and the teams must cross the finish line together. I volunteered for one of the most difficult legs, doing 6.2 miles up Guanella Pass. Looks like I have a lot of hill running to do to be ready for this race.

The Denver Marathon (October 15, 2006) will be my first stand alone marathon ever. I had planned to do the Dallas White Rock marathon back in December of 2003 in preparation for Ironman Wisconsin, but a nagging knee injury forced me to withdraw. As a result, the only marathon I've ever done came at the end of the Ironman, following 2.4 miles of swimming and 112 on the bike. I'd like to see what I'm capable of in a standalone marathon. My Ironman marathon was a little disappointing, as I ran/walked it to a 5 hour split. With proper training, I think I can get down to a 3:30 finishing time (eventually), and I'm shooting for a sub-4 hour time this fall. Prparing for the Outward Bound Relay should help a lot, as I'm sure I'll need to run quite a few hills and mountain passes to be ready for that. That can only help my speed and endurance for the flat Denver Marathon.

Marathon Goal Time: 3:56:00 (~9 min/mi pace)

More to come on the training front.

Monday, May 15, 2006

Revising the Training Plan

I've decided to re-structure my shorter term training/racing goals to hopefully make the Ironman training plan more successful. In a nutshell, I plan to work on my run fitness and endurance so that I can hopefully pull off a much better marathon at Ironman Coeur d'Alene ("IMCdA") next year than I did at Ironman Wisconsin (IMMoo) in 2004. Here's how the IMCdA goal stack up against IMMoo 2004:

Race LegIMMoo '04 ActualIMCdA '07 GoalDifference
Swim01:10:33 (1:52/100m)01:00:00 (~1:33/100m)00:10:33
T100:10:1600:05:0000:05:16
Bike06:01:21 (18.6 mph)05:45:00 (~19.5 mph)00:16:21
T200:04:3400:03:0000:01:34
Run05:00:29 (11:29/mi)04:22:00 (~10:00/mi)00:38:29
Total12:27:1311:15:001:12:13

This is quite a lofty improvement goal, I know... particularly given the time commitment that I can reasonably put into this. However, these are best-case goals. Ultimately, I really only want to finish the race. So how am I going to do this?

Well... the first thing I've decided to do is to pretty much scrap this racing season as far as triathlons go. I've already signed up for one sprint race, but I'm not doing any other races this year, and certainly nothing longer than a sprint distance. Maybe I'll do another, late-season sprint, but I'm not sure. What I am sure of is that my summer will be focused on run-specific training.

What does this mean? Well, I'm going to do a LOT more running, and a less swimming and cycling. This doesn't mean I'll completely quit swimming and cycling, nor that I'll ignore their significance (I really like these two disciplines a LOT more than I like running, so I really can't imagine completely ignoring them). Instead, it means my overall volume and/or fequency of these two disciplines will be reduced, while my overall volume and/or frequency of run training will increase.

Because I like swimming and cycling so much, need to give myself some additional motivation to increase my run training. So, I've decided to target the Denver Marathon (October 15, 2006) to be my very first stand-alone marathon.

Principles of the original plan relating to intensity, volume and duration of workouts will continue. The only difference is that until after the marathon, weeks will be structured first around run training, and then around a long cycling session and a quality cycling session, and finally around short, intense swim sessions. More to come in later postings.

Sunday, April 16, 2006

Starting the new plan

Tomorrow is the start of the new training plan for Ironman Coeur d'Alene 2007 (IMCdA). As I mentioned in a previous post, although this race is the A number 1, big cheese goal race for me for the next year or so, I may have to put it off until 2008 or beyond because of the impending birth of my twins in late September or early October. However, until I actually make the decision to put off this second Ironman attempt, I'm going to train as if it's definitely on the schedule for next year.

I still can't believe I let myself get in such awful shape. I've done virtually nothing since October/November of 2005. I have eaten crap food and gained 25 lbs. I'm SOOOO looking forward to getting back into this... I feel gross!

The Preparation Phase

Tomorrow marks the beginning of what I'm calling the Preparation phase for my training plan. The training that I've planned for this phase is intended to get me moving again and strengthen my muscles and connective tissues so that I can avoid injury and build strength.

Week 1 Schedule & Statistics

Beginning weight: 220 lbs

MoTuWeThFrSaSuTotal
Swim0:451:001:002:45
Bike0:451:000:302:001:005:15
Run0:100:200:200:100:100:300:101:50
Total1:401:201:200:101:402:301:109:50

Friday, April 14, 2006

Training for Ironman Coeur d'Alene 2007 - Part 1

Overview

This plan is based on principles of periodization, meaning
that the plan is composed of phases called “periods,” which are structured to
permit the participant to reach the ultimate goal/goals with respect to a
specific event or events.

In a traditional periodization plan for triathlon events (for example, see The Triathlete’s Training Bible by Joe Friel), a racer will follow periods structured in the following way:

· Preparation – in this phase, the participant prepares the body for the rigors of endurance training by introducing low intensity, low duration, high frequency workouts. The goal is to get used to frequent training, but keep the intensity and overall volume low, gradually building up the overall volume so that the muscles and connective tissues can withstand the large volumes and higher intensities to come.

· Base – in this phase, the participant begins adapting the body for the long efforts of each discipline. Principles for this period typically center on progressively extending the overall volume of training time/distance to reach individual workouts approaching the time/distance the participant expects to event disciplines to last. For Ironman events, plan participants will work their way toward the completion of weekly training sessions including a long swim (~ 4000m), long bike (~ 5-7 hours) and a long run (~2.5 – 3 hours). Intensities are traditionally low, while overall volume steadily increases throughout the phase. Toward the end of the phase, participants will typically introduce more intensity into shorter workouts as they move into the Build phase, but keep increasing the duration of long workouts.

· Build – in this phase, participants traditionally shift the focus from volume to intensity. Efforts are harder and paces are typically faster. Weekly long workouts remain long and at low intensity to preserve the endurance built up during the Base period. This phase is traditionally thought to be the period where race speed is built.

· Peak – The peak phase begins the taper toward the race. Volume drops dramatically, while intensity remains very high, or increases. Recovery time increases so that muscles are well-rested prior to the race. The Peak phase usually lasts the last 1-2 weeks before the race week.

My plan incorporates the nomenclature of the traditional periodization plan, but alters the principles involved in the Base and Build periods. In other words, the Base period will be centered on building speed and power (as well as endurance) in the early part of the plan and over the winter months, while reserving the bulk of the work relating to endurance and muscular endurance for the Build phase. In the Preparation phase, I will gradually work toward higher intensities while maintaining relatively low volume. In fact my volume will stay essentially the same throughout the Preparation and Base periods, and will only increase as race-specific training is introduced during the Build period.

This type of plan is often referred to as “reverse
periodization” because it “reverses” the traditional focus of the Base and Build periods. In actuality, this is a bit of a misnomer, because true periodization basically refers to moving from less race-specific to more race-specific training. In ultra-distance racing, short duration, high intensity efforts are less race-specific, while longer duration, lower intensity efforts are more race-specific. Therefore, for purposes of ultra-distance triathlon racing, this plan would appear to follow the proper principles for true periodization. For purposes of consistency in traditional nomenclature, I’ll refer to this plan as incorporating principles of reverse periodization.

Plan Periods

General Preparation

Principles

In this phase, I will prepare my body for the stresses of endurance training. Following the traditional model, I’ll first introduce lower intensities and durations while keeping frequency high.

High Level Objectives

· Get used to frequent training

· Build muscle strength

· Strengthen my connective tissues so they’ll be able to withstand the higher intensities of the base period and the large volumes in the Build period.

· Lose weight

Base

Principles

This phase focuses on building strength and power. Workouts are relatively short (lasting no more than about 1- 1½ hours. Efforts for most workouts are very high, and paces are typically faster.

Weekly “long” workouts will focus on longer durations and lower intensities. Long bike rides may reach 2½-3 hours; long runs will cap at 1½-2 hours; and long swims will consist of straight swims reaching about 3000 meters or long interval sets (e.g., 800s or 1000s).

High Level Objectives

· Improve threshold power on the bike

· Increase speed in all disciplines

· Improve form and efficiency in all disciplines

· Improve sport-specific strength

Build

Principles

In the Build phase, I’ll start training my body to “go long,” meaning I’ll be taking the strength and speed built during the Base phase, and adapting it for the long haul. Weekday workouts will reflect this by incorporating increasingly longer intervals to build muscular endurance. Long workouts will start getting longer, and may incorporate race-specific intervals within them.

Principles for this period typically center on progressively extending the overall volume of training time/distance to reach individual workouts approaching the time/distance the participant expects to event disciplines to last. For Ironman events, plan participants will work their way toward the completion of weekly training sessions including a long swim (~ 4000m), long bike (~ 5-7 hours) and a long run (~2.5 – 3 hours). Intensities are traditionally low, while overall volume steadily increases throughout the phase. Toward the end of the phase, participants will typically introduce more intensity into shorter workouts as they move into the Build phase, but keep increasing the duration of long workouts.

High Level Objectives

· Build endurance and muscular endurance

Peak

Principles

The peak phase begins the taper toward the race. Volume drops dramatically, while intensity remains very high, or increases. Recovery time increases so that muscles are well-rested prior to the race. Long workout duration is reduced, but intensity is increased

High Level Objectives

· Increase recovery time to allow the muscles to rest in preparation for the race.

Wednesday, April 12, 2006

Ironman Comes Calling Again... Do I Answer?

So... I've taken a LOT of time off from training. Not really because I planned to, but because I just didn't feel like training for a long time. After a disappointing racing season last year, I just didn't have the desire anymore. When the desire disappears, it's hard to get motivated. Beyond a few sporadic swims and a couple of cycling sessions on the trainer... I've done nothing. Haven't run since November.

It is now May. A few weeks ago, I was in Austin, and did a ride with my brother's cycling group. Boy am I out of shape. After that humbling experience and the growing realization that I REALLY want to do another Ironman, I can feel the old flames a-burnin'. So, I've dusted off the old running flats, tuned up the bicycles and started to set up a new training plan.

Due to the lateness of the season and the impending birth of my kids, I won't race any long distances this year. I might do one or two local sprints, but this will be mostly a base-building year.

I'm considering entry to Ironman Coeur d'Alene in 2007. My brother wants to step up to the Ironman distance, and as I said, I'd like to do my second. With the kids coming in late September or early October, though, I'm not sure I'll have the necessary ability (or sleep schedule) to keep up the required training. Have to think some more on this one.

Stats Post IM Wisconsin 2004:

Height:6'4" lbs
Weight:183 lbs
Base:1 year (2003) International/Half IM training, 1 year (2004) IM Specific training

Current Stats:

Height:6'4" lbs
Weight:219 lbs
Base:1 year (2003) International/Half IM training, 1 year (2004) IM Specific training, 1 year (2005) Half-IM specific training; nothing since October, 2005.

Thursday, November 10, 2005

Moved in... Starting the Project

We've now moved into the new house, and I'm ready to start working on the home control and entertainment system.

I'm going to start with the whole-house media system. While I really want to incorporate touch panels and PDA controls, that's going to have to be an on-going re-design. Right now, I need something functional. Here are the design specs and system components.

Specifications

  1. The entertainment system will be composed of 2 initial Zones, the Living Room Zone ("Den") and the Master Bedroom Zone ("MBR"). The direct display equipment (TV and speakers) will be located in these rooms. All source equipment is located in the basement, and distributed to the zones.
  2. Any source must be available and controllable from either zone.
  3. Source Equipment
    • Denon AVR-3805 multizone receiver
    • Philips DSR6000 Series 1 DirectTV receiver with Tivo
    • Hughes HNS HDVR-2 Series 2 DirectTV receiver with Tivo
    • Sony 5-disc CD carousel
    • Sony single disc DVD Player
    • Sony Video cassette recorder/player
    • Windows XP Pro-based HTPC
  4. Den Display Components
    • TV - wall-mounted Panasonic 42" Plasma TV
    • Speakers - 5.1 channel surround - in-wall Front L& R; in-wall center; in-ceiling rear surround; subwoofer
  5. MBR Display Components
    • TV - Samsung 30" tube TV
    • Speakers - in-ceiling Stereo
  6. Control System
    • RF & IR based handheld remotes
    • 2x Universal Remote Osiris MX350 RF+IR remotes
    • MRF-300 addressable base station

Overview of the System

As stated, all of the source equipment is located in the basement, and is distributed via a GreyFox structured wiring system. The 3805 is the distribution point for the audio and video. The speaker ports are wired to the speaker wiring ports, which distribute the sound inependently to the two zones. The big plus here? No visible speaker wires (except the subwoofer in the Den).

The Den Zone

The main video out on the 3805 is a component video output, which is fed into this component video balun from MuxLab, and run via Cat5e cable to a port behind the plasma in the Den Zone. The 3805 utilizes video up-converting, so even though none of my source equipment uses component video (yet), I can still output component video to the plasma display.

The plasma is basically just a monitor. All video displayed on the plasma is transmitted by the 3805.

The MBR Zone

The Zone 2 video output on the 3805 is a composite video signal. Not great, but then, video quality is not so important in the MBR Zone. Using an adapter, I just placed the composite video signal onto an existing RG6 coaxial cable, which is run from the structured wiring box to the master bedroon cable port. From there, I use another adapter to convert back to an RCA plug, and plug the video directly into the Samsung TV's composite video in port. Since the speakers are hard-wired to the Zone 2 audio output of the 3805, there is no audio signal on the RG6 cable or fed into the Samsung's audio ports. Like the plasma in the Den Zone, it's just a display.

Remote Control

The Osiris Mx-350 universal remotes and the MRF-300 base station permit combined RF/IR control of the source equipment and the zone-specific display equipment. The Osiris simultaneously sends out its control signals in both IR and RF format. For display equipment within the zone, the IR signals can control the equipment, while the RF signals are received and interpreted by the base station, translated to IR codes, and distributed to the source equipment via the individual emitters.

I bought the Mx-350 and the MRF-300 because I needed addressable IR distribution, since the two different DirecTV/Tivo models would interfere with each other. Using the Mx-350 and the MRF-300, I can use only RF control, which is then translated to the proper IR codes, and only distributed to the DTivo being controlled. The emitter for the other DTivo ignores the signal.

Pros

This setup has a lot of pluses. First, it's relatively cheap. I spend about $400 for two Mx-350s and the MRF-300. Second, it's fast to set-up. I got this setup working within a day or two. The hardest part is training the remotes. The Mx-350 has a great feature. Once you've trained one remote, you can "clone" it to the other. This saves a lot of time, although you do have to re-train parts of it for any display equipment that differs between zones.

Cons

Although this system is functional, it has a few flaws. First, there's no way to prevent control of a source if it's being used within a zone. For example, if I'm watching Tivo 1 in the Den, and my wife wants to watch TV upstairs in Zone 2, she has no way of knowing which Tivo I'm watching. Already, I've had problems with her switching my channel while I'm trying to watch TV. Granted, all I have to do is switch over to Tivo 2, but it'd be nice to have a "LOCK" feature to prevent control of a source in Zone 2 when it's being used in Zone 1.

Second, there is often a difficulty in the RF signals getting through to the base station. It seems that the system fails intermittently in that you press a button, and get nothing. It can be frustrating, although it seldom lasts long.

Finally, the system is not particularly intuitive, even given the ability to create macros. If a part of the macro fails, you have to go to the individual source and "fix" the problem. This results in an unfriendly interface, which requires a learning curve. The "wife factor" is very low with this system (although, on the plus side, she doesn't steal the remote that often!! :) ).

Future Plans

I need a system that allows more intuitive programming, functionality and interface. I'm currently looking at using Charmed Quark. It's a windows-based system for setting up control systems for home automation and A/V distribution. It seems to be fairly easy to use for someone with at least limited programming skills. However, it looks like it'll require quite a bit of an investment in time and money in order to get a good, workable system that fits my criteria. However, the monetary cost will likely still be far less than that for a professional Crestron or AMX system.

More to come later.

Tuesday, October 11, 2005

Home Automation and the New House

So... the new house is nearing completion, and it's time to start thinking about how to outfit it. As this is a brand new home and we've installed a structured wiring plan, we want to deck it out with an audio/video distribution system and home automation system. Cost, however, is a huge concern, because, frankly... I don't want to spend a ton of money on new components or expensive hardware and systems that may be obsolete in a couple of years. Besides, I like doing this stuff, and I'd like to make it as DIY as possible. So... how do I do it?

Below are a listing of and the specifications for each part of the wired house.

Specifications

  1. MultiZone A/V distribution
    1. Dual Home Theater
    2. Central location for all hardware
    3. Any source in any zone capability
  2. Home Automation (future)
    1. Zoned lighting control
    2. Thermostat control/monitoring
    3. Irrigation control

Main Concerns

  1. Low initial cost - pre-built, custom solutions can quickly and easily run into the several thousands of dollars. I don't have the money for that. I'm willing to sacrifice a bit of the "professional" look to get a workable, custom, expandable solution.
  2. Upgradable - We don't have a lot of really high end stuff. We're not big into HDTV yet, and we just don't have the hardware. But that doesn't mean we won't WANT it. I want the ability to upgrade as we go without replacing the entire system.
  3. Expandable - We want to be able to add components for media and home control as needed.
  4. Central - I want to be able to control media, irrigation, lights, etc. from a limited number of control panels strategically placed around the house.
  5. Mobile - if possible, I'd like to be able to use modile devices (PDA, cell phone, the Internet, etc.) to remotely control features while outside of the home.
  6. Looks Nice - While I don't need the "professional" look of a Crestron or AMX system, I'd like the system to look nice and act more or less reliably.

Current Components for the Media System

  1. Denon multi-zone receiver
  2. DirecTV/Tivo - Series 1
  3. DirecTV/Tivo - Series 2
  4. Sony DVD Player
  5. Sony CD - 5 disc carousel
  6. Sony VCR
  7. Sony Tape player
  8. Windows XP-based media server/HTPC

Subsequent posts will detail the installation of the system.